Top of page
Education and Employment

Pakistan’s top court orders expansion of disability quota

Portrait of young businesswoman wearing headscarf using laptop at desk while working in office against red wall

The Supreme Court in Pakistan has ordered that the disability quota or affirmative reservations for people with disabilities should be calculated on the bases of total sanctioned staff strength in an establishment.

In a 12-page judgment, Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah made a slew of observations on the allocation of job quota for persons with disabilities, while calling for making workplaces and polices inclusive and accessible.

“To ensure fair and equitable representation of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in every tier of the establishment, the total disability quota is to be further apportioned and allocated amongst different categories of posts in the establishment,” Justice Shah said.

The court held that in case the sanctioned strength of a post was less than 50, it will for the establishment to allocate seat(s) from the overall disability quota against it.

If a particular post is not fit for a PWD, the establishment could shift the disability quota and adjust it against another post in the establishment so that the overall quota was not disturbed and maintained at all times.

The advertisement for any category of post must provide the total disability quota for that category of posts and the number of seats vacant under the quota at the time of the advertisement.

The apex court noted that the legal question that arose in the case was the manner of allocation of the 2% disability quota for employment under the Disabled Persons (Employment and Rehabilitation) Ordinance, 1981.

The judgment noted that one of the major difficulties faced by persons with disabilities was that employers had the erroneous assumption that these people would underperform in most areas of their duties – which was not the case.

The judges noted that when the majority of workplaces were not made accessible to people with disabilities, employers felt that they would have to make an unwarranted investment to provide facilities to them. Some did not believe in the employment potential of such people.

The court noted that the government and the concerned establishment were bound to provide the infrastructure, access, support, and facilities, so that persons with disabilities, once appointed to a post, could perform their job without feeling physically or emotionally incapacitated in any manner. “The biggest barrier to the employment of persons with disabilities is the accessibility and their social acceptability at the workplace.”
The court noted that without making this possible, the disability quota and the purpose of the ordinance would stand frustrated and serve no useful purpose.

You might also like

cropped image of man in wheelchair with bag riding on crosswalk cropped image of man in wheelchair with bag riding on crosswalk

Disability Bill withdrawn, creating more uncertainty

The Allan Labor Government has embarrassingly withdrawn a Bill introduced…

Members of Solidarity Against Disability Discrimination hold a protest Members of Solidarity Against Disability Discrimination hold a protest

Activists protest Seoul Subway demanding disability rights

Activists from Solidarity Against Disability Discrimination (SADD) staged a rush-hour…

A woman in a wheelchair and accompanied by a dog, go on a pedestrian crossing. A woman in a wheelchair and accompanied by a dog, go on a pedestrian crossing.

Report reveals shifts in daily life for Queenslanders with disabilities

A new report reveals how life for Queenslanders with Disabilities…

blind man with walking stick in the street blind man with walking stick in the street

UN disability rights committee publishes findings on DPRK, Finland, Others

The UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on…