Top of page
Law

EEOC sues Walmart for disability discrimination

Walmart store

Wal-Mart Stores East, LP violated federal law when it failed to provide a reasonable accommodation to an employee and then fired her after she made an internal ethics complaint of disability discrimination, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleged in a lawsuit filed on June 30.

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, in April 2019 an employee working for Walmart’s Hope Mills, North Carolina store as a warehouse unloader experienced the onset of severe pain due to a neuro¬logical disability that affected her right hand and wrist. Her supervisor told her to apply for medical leave through the company’s third-party administrator to avoid accruing points under the attendance policy. The employee applied for intermittent leave as a reasonable accommodation for her disability but the accommodation was denied.

Walmart then told the employee that she could not return to work unless she could provide a medical release saying that she could work without any restrictions, which was not possible due to the employee’s disability. Frustrated by Walmart’s continued refusal to allow her to return to work, the employee made a report to the company’s Global Ethics Office in late June 2019. The company fired her nine days later.

Such conduct violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which protects individuals with disabilities from workplace discrimination and requires that employers provide reasonable accom¬modations for disabilities. Retaliating against an employee for complaining about discrimination also violates federal law. The EEOC filed suit in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Civil Action No.: 5:22-cv-00252) after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its voluntary concili-ation process.

The EEOC seeks monetary relief for the employee, including back pay, and com¬pensatory and punitive damages. The EEOC also seeks injunctive relief against the company to end any ongoing discrimination and to prevent such unlawful conduct in the future.

“Individuals with disabilities have a right to work,” said Melinda C. Dugas, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Charlotte District. “Employer policies requiring employees to show that they are 100% healed or can otherwise work without any restrictions before returning from medical leave violates public policy and runs afoul of the ADA. Additionally, the statute prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who seek an accommodation for a disability.”

The EEOC’s Charlotte District is charged with enforcing federal employment anti-discrimination laws in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia.

You might also like

Gavel and law books Gavel and law books

Govt rushes disability bill, excludes persons with disabilities voices

The Green Party says the Government has failed persons with…

blurred movement disabled man on a city street blurred movement disabled man on a city street

Greens oppose rushed disability support law changes

The Green Party is opposing the Government’s Disability Support Services…

Lady Justice Statue Scales of Justice Bronze with disability icon Lady Justice Statue Scales of Justice Bronze with disability icon

Queensland disability services company faces court

The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against a…

The Beehive in Wellington, New Zealand. The Beehive in Wellington, New Zealand.

Bill to strengthen disability support services

The New Zealand government has introduced the Disability Support Services…