Top of page
Law

EEOC sues Walmart for disability discrimination

Walmart store

Wal-Mart Stores East, LP violated federal law when it failed to provide a reasonable accommodation to an employee and then fired her after she made an internal ethics complaint of disability discrimination, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleged in a lawsuit filed on June 30.

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, in April 2019 an employee working for Walmart’s Hope Mills, North Carolina store as a warehouse unloader experienced the onset of severe pain due to a neuro¬logical disability that affected her right hand and wrist. Her supervisor told her to apply for medical leave through the company’s third-party administrator to avoid accruing points under the attendance policy. The employee applied for intermittent leave as a reasonable accommodation for her disability but the accommodation was denied.

Walmart then told the employee that she could not return to work unless she could provide a medical release saying that she could work without any restrictions, which was not possible due to the employee’s disability. Frustrated by Walmart’s continued refusal to allow her to return to work, the employee made a report to the company’s Global Ethics Office in late June 2019. The company fired her nine days later.

Such conduct violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which protects individuals with disabilities from workplace discrimination and requires that employers provide reasonable accom¬modations for disabilities. Retaliating against an employee for complaining about discrimination also violates federal law. The EEOC filed suit in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Civil Action No.: 5:22-cv-00252) after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its voluntary concili-ation process.

The EEOC seeks monetary relief for the employee, including back pay, and com¬pensatory and punitive damages. The EEOC also seeks injunctive relief against the company to end any ongoing discrimination and to prevent such unlawful conduct in the future.

“Individuals with disabilities have a right to work,” said Melinda C. Dugas, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Charlotte District. “Employer policies requiring employees to show that they are 100% healed or can otherwise work without any restrictions before returning from medical leave violates public policy and runs afoul of the ADA. Additionally, the statute prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who seek an accommodation for a disability.”

The EEOC’s Charlotte District is charged with enforcing federal employment anti-discrimination laws in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia.

You might also like

A disabled girl being lifted into a wheelchair with help from a special lift operated by a care assistant. A disabled girl being lifted into a wheelchair with help from a special lift operated by a care assistant.

New Zealand Select Committee modifies Disability Support Services Bill

New Zealand’s Social Services and Community Select Committee reported back…

NDIS building NDIS building

Rights Commission urges Australia to pause on NDIS reform Bill

The Australian Human Rights Commission is calling on the Australian…

Police arrested the woman Police arrested the woman

Darwin woman charged over alleged abuse of public office, NDIS fruad

A Darwin woman is the second person to be charged…

businesswoman in wheelchair going through reports while working female coworker in the office. businesswoman in wheelchair going through reports while working female coworker in the office.

U.S. House approves bill removing work barriers for persons with disabilities

The U.S. House of Representatives approved the Removing Barriers to…