Top of page
Law

Disability community in Australia calls for reform after discrimination claims become ‘impossible to prove’

Legal law concept image, gavel on book

A frustrated alliance of lawyers and community organisations has lobbied the Commonwealth Attorney-General to rewrite Australia’s disability discrimination laws after a court case made discrimination claims “near on impossible to prove.”

The alliance of 46 disability rights, community and legal organisations and 15 individuals has written to Attorney-General Michaelia Cash asking her to rewrite parts of the federal Disability Discrimination Act 1992.

The group, which includes People with Disability Australia (PWDA), has argued a four-year-old Federal Court case known as Sklavos is undermining the protections people with disability are supposed to enjoy in federal anti-discrimination laws.

PWDA chief executive officer Sebastian Zagarella said the court’s interpretation of the Disability Discrimination Act in Sklavos v Australian College of Dermatologists had to be set right with legislative change.

“We are calling on Senator Cash and the Morrison Government to reconfirm the intentions of the Disability Discrimination Act and make it essential that organisations provide reasonable adjustments to people with disability,” Mr Zagarella said.

Reasonable adjustments can be changes made at work and schools, in accommodation, in enabling access to facilities, land and premises – or clubs and sports – and in the delivery of goods and services.

About 45% of people with disability report experiencing disability discrimination from their employer. The percentage that experiences discrimination could be even higher.

One in six people with disability have also experienced discrimination in
education settings.

Respected disability lawyer, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights vice-president Natalie Wade, said the Sklavos case had effectively removed the onus on organisations to take positive action to accommodate a person’s disability.

“Thanks to the Sklavos case, people with disability face the heavy burden of proving there’s a causal connection between their disability and the organisation’s failure to provide reasonable accommodations,” Adelaide-based legal practitioner
Ms Wade said.

“With such an insurmountable barrier, it is near on impossible to prove disability discrimination in court and much more difficult to secure reasonable adjustments in practice.”

The Act’s reasonable adjustment provisions were designed to provide substantive equality for people with disability in a range of settings, by ensuring changes to structures, systems and practices to accommodate disability.

People with disability need discrimination laws to support us in all areas of life, including employment, education, health, transport, accommodation, recreation and culture.

Discrimination can lead to people with disability avoiding everyday activities and increases the odds of people experiencing psychological distress.

 

You might also like

American Airlines American Airlines

American Airlines sued by EEOC for firing blind reservations agent

American Airlines violated federal law when it refused to provide…

Young disabled woman in wheelchair show her presentation on a laptop and discuss with her two colleagues in the workplace office room. Young disabled woman in wheelchair show her presentation on a laptop and discuss with her two colleagues in the workplace office room.

Indonesia paves way for inclusive employment services

Access to employment, care services and social protection remains a…

Walmart store Walmart store

EEOC sues Walmart for disability discrimination

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged Walmart of…

woman on wheelchair attending the conference woman on wheelchair attending the conference

Ventura to host statewide government and disability summit

The County of Ventura will host the second annual Government…